It is not about health care reform. It is about POWER

Vote NO to cap and trade!!!!

Vote NO to Obama’s Health care reform!!!!

Obama’s health care plan is not about health care it is about government control and the ability of government to ration health care when it chooses.

Republican Plan is Health Savings Accounts that are tax free and tort reform and let Insurance companies compete across state lines. Doctors and patient would have the power and Freedom to make medical decisions based on what is best for the patient.

We do not have to choose between Freedom and health care but if we did I would choose Freedom every time!

Patrick Henry said,” Give me liberty or give me death.” Not Give me free health care or give me death.

Obama's Own Prejudices

Obama was asked about Gates' arrest and began his response by saying Gates was a friend and he didn't have all the facts.

If you admit you do not have all the facts Then how can you give an intelligent and accurate opinion about an incident?

To judge beforehand without possessing adequate evidence is the definition of Prejudge which is the root word of Prejudice.

Conclusion: Obama based his opinion on his personal Prejudices.

Liberal reasons VS Conservative reasons

Rule No. Liberal reasons
1 Rule of compassionate man (Law only applies when it produces desired Outcome.)
2 equal outcome
3 governmental responsibility
4 instant gratification
5 flight
6 idealist
7 personnel safety
8 dependent on group and believe in subsidies
9 weak, selfish, and opportunistic

Liberal Leader's reasons
10 do not trust their followers wisdom
11 try to rule from the top down

12 Believe in Two sets of laws 1 for followers and another for leaders.

13 believe in 1 class being ruled by an elite upper class with no incentive
for work or good behavior. Opportunity for moving up or down is based on
loyalty to political Ideology only and not honesty or integrity.

14 make decisions for their followers while absolving their followers
of any personnel responsibility for their own actions

15 want their followers to have equal amounts of money
regardless of their behavior or work skill.

16 believe only in power of scientist and Intellectuals and
what their 5 senses are able to detect

17 They make no distinction between scientific theory and fact.
(Big Bang Theory) (Man Made Global Warming Theory)

18 They believe science has replaced religion
They have faith in scientific theory before it is proven. They criticize religious
people for having faith in religion with out any proof. Science is their religion.

19 They try to impose their religious beliefs on others through legislation
(Global Warming)



Liberal Beliefs

20 They believe the US is a bad nation because of their wealth and military power.
They believe that no one can become rich with out stealing from the poor.

21 They believe that right is always weak and the strong are always wrong.

22 They do not believe in good and evil
They do not discriminate between governments that are ruled by the people and the
ones that rule against the will of the majority of their citizens.

23 they tend to Mock Judea Christian moral beliefs

24 They believe the world is over populated and the government should control
population. Government paid abortions. (small manageable war or terrorism)
(Pro Gay for population control)

25 they believe the US uses too much energy and should use less. Lower *our standard
of living to help others. (*The term our means everyone else not them)

26 They usually reward bad behavior and punish good behavior and are surprised when
they get more bad behavior than good.

27 They want small wars for population control that are manageable by them and are fair
where both sides have equal casualties.


Conservative reasons

1 Rule of law (law applies equally to all regardless of Outcome.

2 equal opportunity

3 Personnel responsibility

4 delayed gratification

5 fight

6 realist

7 Personnel Freedom

8 independent & self reliant

9 Strong, Loyal, and dependable

Conservative Leader's reasons

10 trust the collective wisdom of their followers

11 try to rule from the bottom up

12 believe in one set of laws for leaders and followers

13 believe in 3 basic classes in society
1 small lower, 1 large middle class, and
an upper class with everyone having equal
opportunity to move up or down based
on ability, work and behavior.

14 Allow their followers free Will, but hold them
accountable for their actions.

15 Want to reward work with money proportionate to the
quantity, quality, and importance to society.

16 faith in a higher power than man


17 They know historically that scientific fact has changed
with new scientific knowledge. (Flat earth)

18 They believe science can help explain religion


19 They try to impose their religious beliefs on others through peer pressure at church.
Shun people who commit adultery or sexual harassment


Conservative Beliefs

20 They believe the US is a Great nation because of freedom they were able
to become rich and powerful through hard work and not stealing.

21 They believe that other moral nations could be wealthy if their governments would
allow them to have freedom and capitalism.

22 They do believe in good and evil
Good government= the government works for the people, laws are made with the
consent of the majority of the people, one set of laws that apply equally to everyone.

23 they tend to respect Judea Christian moral beliefs

24 They believe that the fathers should marry the mother of their child and support their
children that would lead to fewer births than the government supporting
their children for them through welfare.

25 They believe that making the rich poor doesn't make the poor rich.
A moral culture with freedom and capitalism will become prosperous.

26 They reward good behavior and punish bad behavior.


27 They want to use all the force necessary to win the war as quick as possible with the
lowest casualties on our side and then have peace.

Something Rush and Rev. Wright can agree on

I believe when we hear someone talk about our country or our flag what they are really talking about is our founding fathers and their Ideals. The principles stated in our founding documents like the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the Federalist papers.

When Rush Talks about those principles it is with love and respect and
when Rev. Wright speaks about those same principles it is with hate and contempt.

The question is it unpatriotic to hate capitalism and to love socialism?

Second question: What is the definition of patriotism?
The dictionary definition: devoted love, support, and defense of one's country; national loyalty

Third Question: Could a German citizen hate Nazism in Germany and love capitalism in 1940 and be loyal to his country at the same time while an American could hate capitalism in his country and love Nazism in 1940?

Fourth question: Are either traitors or patriots or is only one a traitor?
Why?

Opinion: If a person pretends to be a Nazi when he isn’t and then betrays them he is a traitor but if he is truthful about his beliefs then he is not.

Opinion: Rev Wright is telling the truth about his hate for our constitution he can claim to be a patriot and disagree with our form of government.

Opinion: If Obama is pretending to believe in our constitution when he does not then he is the traitor and not Rev. Wright.

How do you think the new Immigration Bill compares to the current rules we have that are listed below?

Website for information below http://www.immigrationtest.org/RulesforAmericanCitizenship.html

US rules for American citizenship dictate that to become a naturalized citizen of the United States, American citizenship laws require:

Age: Applicants must be at least 18 years old.

Residency United States Immigration policies and rules for American citizenship require that an applicant must have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence. Lawfully admitted for permanent residence means having been legally accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws. Individuals who have been lawfully admitted as permanent residents will be asked to produce an I-551, Alien Registration Receipt Card, as proof of their status.

Residence and Physical Presence According to rules for American citizenship, an applicant is eligible to file if, immediately preceding the filing of the application, he or she:
has been lawfully admitted for permanent residence; has resided continuously as a lawful permanent resident in the U.S. for at least 5 years prior to filing with absences from the United States totaling no more than one year; has been physically present in the United States for at least 30 months out of the previous five years (absences of more than six months but less than one year break the continuity of residence unless the applicant can establish that he or she did not abandon his or her residence during such period); has resided within a state or district for at least three months.

Good Moral Character US rules for American citizenship dictate that in general, an applicant must show that he or she has been a person of good moral character for the statutory period (typically five years or three years if married to a U.S. citizen or one year for Armed Forces expedite) prior to filing for naturalization. The immigration naturalization service is not limited to the statutory period in determining whether an applicant has established good moral character. Rules for American citizenship permanently bar an applicant from naturalization if he or she has ever been convicted of murder. An applicant is also permanently barred from naturalization if he or she has been convicted of an aggravated felony as defined in section 101(a)(43) of the Act on or after November 29, 1990. In addition, pursuant to the rules for American citizenship, a person also cannot be found to be a person of good moral character if during the last five years he or she:

has committed and been convicted of one or more crimes involving moral turpitude

has committed and been convicted of 2 or more offenses for which the total sentence
imposed was 5 years or more

has committed and been convicted of any controlled substance law, except for a single
offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana

has been confined to a penal institution during the statutory period, as a result of a
conviction, for an aggregate period of 180 days or more

has committed and been convicted of two or more gambling offenses
is or has earned his or her principle income from illegal gambling
is or has been involved in prostitution or commercialized vice
is or has been involved in smuggling illegal aliens into the United States
is or has been a habitual drunkard
is practicing or has practiced polygamy

has willfully failed or refused to support dependents

has given false testimony, under oath, in order to receive a benefit under the Immigration
and Nationality Act.

The rules for American citizenship dictate that an applicant must disclose all relevant facts to the immigration naturalization service, including his or her entire criminal history, regardless of whether the criminal history disqualifies the applicant under the enumerated provisions.

Attachment to the Constitution As required by the rules for American citizenship, an applicant must show to the immigration naturalization service that he or she is attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States.

Language Applicants for naturalization must be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language. Applicants exempt from this requirement are those who on the date of filing: have been residing in the United States subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 15 years and are over 55 years of age; have been residing in the United States subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 20 years and are over 50 years of age; or have a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, where the impairment affects the applicant’s ability to learn English.

United States Government and History Knowledge The American immigration test was developed to test an applicant’s knowledge of US government and history and the English language through an English sentences test. At minimum, an applicant for naturalization is required by the rules for American citizenship to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of the history and of the principles and form of government of the United States. Applicants exempt from this requirement by the immigration naturalization service are those who, on the date of filing, have a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, where the impairment affects the applicant’s ability to learn U.S. History and Government. Applicants who have been residing in the U.S. subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 20 years and are over the age of 65 will be afforded special consideration in satisfying this requirement. Also, note that the new immigration test pilot program is now being used by some offices of the USCIS. A guide with sample questions and answers for the new immigration test is now available.

Oath of Allegiance Pursuant to the rules for American citizenship, to become a citizen, one must take the oath of allegiance. By doing so, an applicant swears to:
support the Constitution and obey the laws of the U.S.;
renounce any foreign allegiance and/or foreign title; and
bear arms for the Armed Forces of the U.S. or perform services for the
government of the U.S. when required.

In certain instances, where the applicant establishes that he or she is opposed to any type of service in armed forces based on religious teaching or belief, the immigration naturalization service will permit these applicants to take a modified oath.

Is the war realy with Iraq now or is it with Iran?

I think the one thing Senator Webb and Senator Graham could agree on is that Iran is the key to most of the violence in Iraq. I think the real debate should be between surrendering to Iran and hoping for the best or defeating Iran. If you choose to defeat Iran then you have another debate on the best way to do it. Like we did with Germany in World War II or like we did with the Soviet Union or maybe there are other ways.

If we surrender to Iran with Iraq what are all the possible problems we will encounter with their terrorism later on in other places.

If we defeat them just think of the impact that would have on ending most of the terrorism all over the world.

Do you support the war in Iraq?

People that say they do not support the war in Iraq really seem to be saying in their argument that they do not support the killing of innocent civilians, war crimes that are occasionally committed, and the injury and death of our own troops.

People that say they do support the war in Iraq really seem to be saying in their argument that they support the goal of stopping Saddam from committing genocide on the Kurds, waging war on its neighbors, and supporting terrorists by giving money to the families of suicide bombers, and having elections so they can form a government that will not support terrorist.

I do not think anyone can honestly disagree with those first two paragraphs (opinion) but people can have an honest debate on the best way to achieve those goals.

Rule one: Do not be disrespectful and call people names you disagree with.
Rule two: Always distinguish between facts and your opinions.

Opinion: the choices we have to chose from in solving the terrorist problem are bad and worse if there was an easy choice we would all agree on it and there would be no debate needed.